Abl v. Labelle
Abl v. Labelle is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 05/08/1991 in the District Court, D. Connecticut. The case was terminated on 08/01/1996.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Connecticut (D. Conn.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Robert N. Chatigny · 3,391 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:91-cv-00395
- Nature of suit
- 893 Environmental matters
Claims under federal environmental statutes. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 05/08/1991
- Date terminated
- 08/01/1996
4,713 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Abl v. Labelle?
Abl v. Labelle is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 05/08/1991 in the District Court, D. Connecticut. The case was terminated on 08/01/1996. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Connecticut, docket number 2:91-cv-00395.
When was the case filed?
Abl v. Labelle was filed on 05/08/1991. It was terminated on 08/01/1996.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 13662185 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:91-cv-00395 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).