Abrams v. Fdic
Abrams v. Fdic is a federal real property lawsuit filed on 09/28/1989 in the District Court, E.D. Kentucky. The case was terminated on 06/29/1994.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. Kentucky (E.D. Ky.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Peggy E Patterson · 91 cases in index
- Docket number
- 0:89-cv-00178
- Nature of suit
- 210 Land condemnation
Government taking of private land through eminent domain. - Jurisdiction
- Government plaintiff
- Date filed
- 09/28/1989
- Date terminated
- 06/29/1994
1,709 Real Property cases in this court are indexed here.
About Real Property Lawsuits
Real property cases involve disputes over land or buildings, such as foreclosures, title and ownership disputes, condemnation, and landlord-tenant matters litigated in federal court.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Abrams v. Fdic?
Abrams v. Fdic is a federal real property lawsuit filed on 09/28/1989 in the District Court, E.D. Kentucky. The case was terminated on 06/29/1994. Real property cases involve disputes over land or buildings, such as foreclosures, title and ownership disputes, condemnation, and landlord-tenant matters litigated in federal court.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Real Property” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Real property cases involve disputes over land or buildings, such as foreclosures, title and ownership disputes, condemnation, and landlord-tenant matters litigated in federal court.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. Kentucky, docket number 0:89-cv-00178.
When was the case filed?
Abrams v. Fdic was filed on 09/28/1989. It was terminated on 06/29/1994.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Real Property Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9014392 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 0:89-cv-00178 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).