Acosta v. MRS-7 Construction, LLC

Court

District Court, N.D. Alabama (N.D. Ala.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Madeline Hughes Haikala · 1,034 cases in index

Docket number

2:25-cv-02125

Cause

15:1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
15 U.S.C. § 1938

Nature of suit

710 Labor: Fair Standards
Unpaid-wage and overtime claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Jurisdiction

Federal Question

Jury demand

Plaintiff

Date filed

12/12/2025

8,760 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Acosta · 1109 cases
• defendant · MRS-7 Construction, LLC

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 2 Labor cases in our index naming MRS-7 Construction, LLC — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

About Labor Lawsuits

Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Acosta v. MRS-7 Construction, LLC?

Acosta v. MRS-7 Construction, LLC is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 12/12/2025 in the District Court, N.D. Alabama. The case is currently open in the federal court system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, N.D. Alabama, docket number 2:25-cv-02125.

When was the case filed?

Acosta v. MRS-7 Construction, LLC was filed on 12/12/2025. The case is currently open.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 15 U.S.C. § 1938.