Acuna v. Jiminez
Acuna v. Jiminez is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 03/27/1996 in the District Court, D. Arizona. The case was terminated on 08/16/1996.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Arizona (D. Ariz.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Earl H Carroll · 2,302 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:96-cv-00755
- Nature of suit
- 890 Other statutory actions
Federal statutory claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 03/27/1996
- Date terminated
- 08/16/1996
6,318 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Acuna v. Jiminez?
Acuna v. Jiminez is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 03/27/1996 in the District Court, D. Arizona. The case was terminated on 08/16/1996. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Arizona, docket number 2:96-cv-00755.
When was the case filed?
Acuna v. Jiminez was filed on 03/27/1996. It was terminated on 08/16/1996.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10228560 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:96-cv-00755 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).