Acuna v. U.S.A
Acuna v. U.S.A is a federal forfeiture / penalty lawsuit filed on 02/05/2003 in the District Court, S.D. New York. The case was terminated on 09/12/2003.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. New York (S.D.N.Y.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Lawrence M. McKenna · 2,763 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:03-cv-00815
- Nature of suit
- 625 Drug related seizure of property
Government forfeiture of property connected to alleged drug activity. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 02/05/2003
- Date terminated
- 09/12/2003
512 Forfeiture / Penalty cases in this court are indexed here.
About Forfeiture / Penalty Lawsuits
Forfeiture and penalty cases involve the government seeking to seize property connected to alleged unlawful activity, or the imposition of federal civil penalties.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Acuna v. U.S.A?
Acuna v. U.S.A is a federal forfeiture / penalty lawsuit filed on 02/05/2003 in the District Court, S.D. New York. The case was terminated on 09/12/2003. Forfeiture and penalty cases involve the government seeking to seize property connected to alleged unlawful activity, or the imposition of federal civil penalties.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Forfeiture / Penalty” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Forfeiture and penalty cases involve the government seeking to seize property connected to alleged unlawful activity, or the imposition of federal civil penalties.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. New York, docket number 1:03-cv-00815.
When was the case filed?
Acuna v. U.S.A was filed on 02/05/2003. It was terminated on 09/12/2003.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 24958914 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:03-cv-00815 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).