Acushnet Company v. Zimventures, LLC

Court

District Court, D. Massachusetts (D. Mass.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

William G. Young · 7,087 cases in index

Docket number

1:15-cv-11524

Cause

35:271 Patent Infringement
35 U.S.C. § 271 — Patent infringement

Nature of suit

830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention.

Jurisdiction

Federal Question

Jury demand

Both

Date filed

04/06/2015

Date terminated

06/07/2016

2,287 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Acushnet Company Miscellaneous Manufacturing · 96 cases
• defendant · Zimventures, LLC

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 2 Patent cases in our index naming Zimventures, LLC — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

About Patent Lawsuits

Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Acushnet Company v. Zimventures, LLC?

Acushnet Company v. Zimventures, LLC is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 04/06/2015 in the District Court, D. Massachusetts. The case was terminated on 06/07/2016. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, D. Massachusetts, docket number 1:15-cv-11524.

When was the case filed?

Acushnet Company v. Zimventures, LLC was filed on 04/06/2015. It was terminated on 06/07/2016.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 35 U.S.C. § 271 — Patent infringement.