Docket Nexus — Federal court records.
Copyright Lawsuit

Adcock v. Arc Ut

Copyright Terminated 04/17/2002 District Court, D. Utah

Adcock v. Arc Ut is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 02/09/2000 in the District Court, D. Utah. The case was terminated on 04/17/2002.

A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.

Court
District Court, D. Utah (D. Utah)
Official Court Website →
Assigned judge
Ted Stewart · 1,967 cases in index
Docket number
2:00-cv-00108
Nature of suit
820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works.
Jurisdiction
Federal question
Date filed
02/09/2000
Date terminated
04/17/2002

547 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

About Copyright Lawsuits

Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Adcock v. Arc Ut?

Adcock v. Arc Ut is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 02/09/2000 in the District Court, D. Utah. The case was terminated on 04/17/2002. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, D. Utah, docket number 2:00-cv-00108.

When was the case filed?

Adcock v. Arc Ut was filed on 02/09/2000. It was terminated on 04/17/2002.

Other Cases Involving These Parties

Related Copyright Cases

Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 19583245 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:00-cv-00108 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).