Adelman v. Allan
Adelman v. Allan is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 03/15/1989 in the District Court, D. New Jersey. The case was terminated on 11/05/1990.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. New Jersey (D.N.J.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- John W. Devine · 265 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:89-cv-01135
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 03/15/1989
- Date terminated
- 11/05/1990
3,656 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Adelman v. Allan?
Adelman v. Allan is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 03/15/1989 in the District Court, D. New Jersey. The case was terminated on 11/05/1990. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. New Jersey, docket number 3:89-cv-01135.
When was the case filed?
Adelman v. Allan was filed on 03/15/1989. It was terminated on 11/05/1990.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9137583 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:89-cv-01135 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).