Adt LLC v. Vision Security, LLC

Court

District Court, S.D. Florida (S.D. Fla.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Daniel T. K. Hurley · 3,596 cases in index

Docket number

9:13-cv-81197

Cause

15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
15 U.S.C. § 1125 — Trademark / unfair competition (Lanham Act)

Nature of suit

840 Trademark
Infringement or dilution of a trademark under the Lanham Act.

Jurisdiction

Federal Question

Jury demand

Defendant

Date filed

11/18/2013

Date terminated

02/24/2015

6,050 Trademark cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Adt LLC Business Services · 184 cases
• defendant · Vision Security, LLC · 2 cases

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 3 Trademark cases in our index naming Vision Security, LLC — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

About Trademark Lawsuits

Trademark lawsuits allege infringement or dilution of a brand name, logo, or other mark under the Lanham Act — typically claims that one party's use is likely to confuse consumers about the source of goods or services.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Adt LLC v. Vision Security, LLC?

Adt LLC v. Vision Security, LLC is a federal trademark lawsuit filed on 11/18/2013 in the District Court, S.D. Florida. The case was terminated on 02/24/2015. Trademark lawsuits allege infringement or dilution of a brand name, logo, or other mark under the Lanham Act — typically claims that one party's use is likely to confuse consumers about the source of goods or services.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Trademark” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Trademark lawsuits allege infringement or dilution of a brand name, logo, or other mark under the Lanham Act — typically claims that one party's use is likely to confuse consumers about the source of goods or services.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, S.D. Florida, docket number 9:13-cv-81197.

When was the case filed?

Adt LLC v. Vision Security, LLC was filed on 11/18/2013. It was terminated on 02/24/2015.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 15 U.S.C. § 1125 — Trademark / unfair competition (Lanham Act).