Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc v. Prinsco, Inc

Court

District Court, S.D. Ohio (S.D. Ohio)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Edmund A. Sargus · 8,633 cases in index

Docket number

2:15-cv-02939

Cause

35:271 Patent Infringement
35 U.S.C. § 271 — Patent infringement

Nature of suit

830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention.

Jurisdiction

Federal Question

Jury demand

Plaintiff

Date filed

10/22/2015

Date terminated

01/28/2016

758 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc Rubber & Plastics Manufacturing · 33 cases
• defendant · Prinsco, Inc · 2 cases

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 3 Patent cases in our index naming Prinsco, Inc — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

About Patent Lawsuits

Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc v. Prinsco, Inc?

Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc v. Prinsco, Inc is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 10/22/2015 in the District Court, S.D. Ohio. The case was terminated on 01/28/2016. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, S.D. Ohio, docket number 2:15-cv-02939.

When was the case filed?

Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc v. Prinsco, Inc was filed on 10/22/2015. It was terminated on 01/28/2016.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 35 U.S.C. § 271 — Patent infringement.