Agyeman v. Cca
Agyeman v. Cca is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 02/02/1998 in the District Court, D. Arizona. The case was terminated on 08/04/1998.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Arizona (D. Ariz.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Paul G Rosenblatt · 2,105 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:98-cv-00188
- Nature of suit
- 893 Environmental matters
Claims under federal environmental statutes. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 02/02/1998
- Date terminated
- 08/04/1998
6,318 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Agyeman v. Cca?
Agyeman v. Cca is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 02/02/1998 in the District Court, D. Arizona. The case was terminated on 08/04/1998. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Arizona, docket number 2:98-cv-00188.
When was the case filed?
Agyeman v. Cca was filed on 02/02/1998. It was terminated on 08/04/1998.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 17658174 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:98-cv-00188 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).