Albers v. Hatfield
Albers v. Hatfield is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 10/16/1989 in the District Court, D. Idaho. The case was terminated on 04/02/1992.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Idaho (D. Idaho)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Harold L. Ryan · 464 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:89-cv-01288
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 10/16/1989
- Date terminated
- 04/02/1992
140 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Albers v. Hatfield?
Albers v. Hatfield is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 10/16/1989 in the District Court, D. Idaho. The case was terminated on 04/02/1992. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Idaho, docket number 1:89-cv-01288.
When was the case filed?
Albers v. Hatfield was filed on 10/16/1989. It was terminated on 04/02/1992.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9481753 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:89-cv-01288 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).