Alexander v. Michigan
Alexander v. Michigan is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 04/18/2016 in the District Court, E.D. Michigan. The case was terminated on 03/29/2017.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. Michigan (E.D. Mich.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Denise Page Hood · 19,760 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:16-cv-11385
- Cause
- 28:1331 Fed. Question
28 U.S.C. § 1331 — Federal question jurisdiction - Nature of suit
- 950 Constitutional - State Statute
Challenges to the constitutionality of a state statute. - Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
- Jury demand
- Plaintiff
- Date filed
- 04/18/2016
- Date terminated
- 03/29/2017
1,479 Other Civil cases in this court are indexed here.
About Other Civil Lawsuits
These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Alexander v. Michigan?
Alexander v. Michigan is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 04/18/2016 in the District Court, E.D. Michigan. The case was terminated on 03/29/2017. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Other Civil” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. Michigan, docket number 2:16-cv-11385.
When was the case filed?
Alexander v. Michigan was filed on 04/18/2016. It was terminated on 03/29/2017.
What law is the case brought under?
The docket lists the cause as 28 U.S.C. § 1331 — Federal question jurisdiction.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Other Civil Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 5501305 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:16-cv-11385 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).