Ameritrust Co v. Schwab D
Ameritrust Co v. Schwab D is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 02/10/1989 in the District Court, M.D. Tennessee. The case was terminated on 03/27/1990.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, M.D. Tennessee (M.D. Tenn.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 02/10/1989
- Date terminated
- 03/27/1990
673 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Ameritrust Co · 14 cases
- defendant · Schwab D
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Ameritrust Co v. Schwab D?
Ameritrust Co v. Schwab D is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 02/10/1989 in the District Court, M.D. Tennessee. The case was terminated on 03/27/1990. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, M.D. Tennessee.
When was the case filed?
Ameritrust Co v. Schwab D was filed on 02/10/1989. It was terminated on 03/27/1990.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9027550 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).