Analog Devices, Inc v. Maxim Integrated
Analog Devices, Inc v. Maxim Integrated is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 01/26/1993 in the District Court, D. Massachusetts. The case was terminated on 04/28/1993.
- Court
- District Court, D. Massachusetts (D. Mass.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- William G. Young · 7,087 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:93-cv-10149
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 01/26/1993
- Date terminated
- 04/28/1993
2,287 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Analog Devices, Inc Semiconductors & Chip Manufacturing · 71 cases
- defendant · Maxim Integrated · 3 cases
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Analog Devices, Inc v. Maxim Integrated?
Analog Devices, Inc v. Maxim Integrated is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 01/26/1993 in the District Court, D. Massachusetts. The case was terminated on 04/28/1993. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Massachusetts, docket number 1:93-cv-10149.
When was the case filed?
Analog Devices, Inc v. Maxim Integrated was filed on 01/26/1993. It was terminated on 04/28/1993.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record (docket 9607813).