Andrew v. Schmidt
Andrew v. Schmidt is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 10/30/2017 in the District Court, E.D. Kentucky. The case was terminated on 10/31/2017.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. Kentucky (E.D. Ky.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Danny C. Reeves · 1,245 cases in index
- Docket number
- 5:17-cv-00429
- Nature of suit
- 890 Other statutory actions
Federal statutory claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 10/30/2017
- Date terminated
- 10/31/2017
1,550 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Andrew v. Schmidt?
Andrew v. Schmidt is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 10/30/2017 in the District Court, E.D. Kentucky. The case was terminated on 10/31/2017. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. Kentucky, docket number 5:17-cv-00429.
When was the case filed?
Andrew v. Schmidt was filed on 10/30/2017. It was terminated on 10/31/2017.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 13519196 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 5:17-cv-00429 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).