Antin v. Rtc
Antin v. Rtc is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 08/24/1988 in the District Court, E.D. Louisiana. The case was terminated on 06/28/1991.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. Louisiana (E.D. La.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- George Arceneaux, Jr · 603 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:88-cv-03721
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 08/24/1988
- Date terminated
- 06/28/1991
4,472 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Antin v. Rtc?
Antin v. Rtc is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 08/24/1988 in the District Court, E.D. Louisiana. The case was terminated on 06/28/1991. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. Louisiana, docket number 2:88-cv-03721.
When was the case filed?
Antin v. Rtc was filed on 08/24/1988. It was terminated on 06/28/1991.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9161936 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:88-cv-03721 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).