Armstrong v. Mathein
Armstrong v. Mathein is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 08/28/2008 in the District Court, N.D. Illinois. The case was terminated on 08/28/2008.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Illinois (N.D. Ill.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- James B. Zagel · 6,139 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:08-cv-04692
- Cause
- 28:1331 Federal Question
28 U.S.C. § 1331 — Federal question jurisdiction - Nature of suit
- 950 Constitutional - State Statute
Challenges to the constitutionality of a state statute. - Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
- Jury demand
- Plaintiff
- Date filed
- 08/28/2008
- Date terminated
- 08/28/2008
1,122 Other Civil cases in this court are indexed here.
About Other Civil Lawsuits
These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Armstrong v. Mathein?
Armstrong v. Mathein is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 08/28/2008 in the District Court, N.D. Illinois. The case was terminated on 08/28/2008. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Other Civil” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Illinois, docket number 1:08-cv-04692.
When was the case filed?
Armstrong v. Mathein was filed on 08/28/2008. It was terminated on 08/28/2008.
What law is the case brought under?
The docket lists the cause as 28 U.S.C. § 1331 — Federal question jurisdiction.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Other Civil Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 4258109 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:08-cv-04692 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).