Arnold v. Quill
Arnold v. Quill is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 09/23/2013 in the District Court, M.D. Florida. The case was terminated on 03/18/2014.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, M.D. Florida (M.D. Fla.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- James D. Whittemore · 3,864 cases in index
- Docket number
- 8:13-cv-02450
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 09/23/2013
- Date terminated
- 03/18/2014
1,630 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Arnold v. Quill?
Arnold v. Quill is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 09/23/2013 in the District Court, M.D. Florida. The case was terminated on 03/18/2014. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, M.D. Florida, docket number 8:13-cv-02450.
When was the case filed?
Arnold v. Quill was filed on 09/23/2013. It was terminated on 03/18/2014.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 13122937 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 8:13-cv-02450 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).