Arrigo v. Bailey
Arrigo v. Bailey is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 04/18/2012 in the District Court, E.D. Louisiana. The case was terminated on 05/09/2013.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. Louisiana (E.D. La.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Eldon E. Fallon · 42,280 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:12-cv-00995
- Nature of suit
- 380 Other personal property damage
Damage to or loss of personal property. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 04/18/2012
- Date terminated
- 05/09/2013
4,472 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Arrigo v. Bailey?
Arrigo v. Bailey is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 04/18/2012 in the District Court, E.D. Louisiana. The case was terminated on 05/09/2013. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. Louisiana, docket number 2:12-cv-00995.
When was the case filed?
Arrigo v. Bailey was filed on 04/18/2012. It was terminated on 05/09/2013.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 12988703 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:12-cv-00995 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).