Asato v. Dabalos
Asato v. Dabalos is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 12/02/1991 in the District Court, D. Hawaii. The case was terminated on 05/07/1992.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Hawaii (D. Haw.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- David Alan Ezra · 2,518 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:91-cv-00685
- Nature of suit
- 380 Other personal property damage
Damage to or loss of personal property. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 12/02/1991
- Date terminated
- 05/07/1992
838 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Asato v. Dabalos?
Asato v. Dabalos is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 12/02/1991 in the District Court, D. Hawaii. The case was terminated on 05/07/1992. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Hawaii, docket number 1:91-cv-00685.
When was the case filed?
Asato v. Dabalos was filed on 12/02/1991. It was terminated on 05/07/1992.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9481502 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:91-cv-00685 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).