Astrazeneca Ab v. Eon Labs
Astrazeneca Ab v. Eon Labs is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 10/10/2000 in the District Court, S.D. New York. The case was terminated on 02/08/2006.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, S.D. New York (S.D.N.Y.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 10/10/2000
- Date terminated
- 02/08/2006
3,549 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Astrazeneca Ab · 185 cases
- defendant · Eon Labs · 9 cases
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Astrazeneca Ab v. Eon Labs?
Astrazeneca Ab v. Eon Labs is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 10/10/2000 in the District Court, S.D. New York. The case was terminated on 02/08/2006. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, S.D. New York.
When was the case filed?
Astrazeneca Ab v. Eon Labs was filed on 10/10/2000. It was terminated on 02/08/2006.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 14136096 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).