Atwell v. Surber
Atwell v. Surber is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 01/03/1995 in the District Court, E.D. Missouri. The case was terminated on 02/23/1995.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. Missouri (E.D. Mo.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- David D. Noce · 1,122 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:95-cv-00001
- Nature of suit
- 380 Other personal property damage
Damage to or loss of personal property. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 01/03/1995
- Date terminated
- 02/23/1995
1,467 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Atwell v. Surber?
Atwell v. Surber is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 01/03/1995 in the District Court, E.D. Missouri. The case was terminated on 02/23/1995. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. Missouri, docket number 2:95-cv-00001.
When was the case filed?
Atwell v. Surber was filed on 01/03/1995. It was terminated on 02/23/1995.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10017281 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:95-cv-00001 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).