Auer v. Cortado Group, LLC

Court

District Court, D. Nevada (D. Nev.)
Official Court Website →

Docket number

2:25-cv-01077

Cause

28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
28 U.S.C. § 1332 — Diversity jurisdiction

Nature of suit

190 Contract: Other
General breach-of-contract disputes not covered by a more specific category.

Jurisdiction

Diversity

Jury demand

None

Date filed

06/17/2025

9,017 Contract cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Auer · 49 cases
• defendant · Cortado Group, LLC

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 2 Contract cases in our index naming Cortado Group, LLC — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

About Contract Lawsuits

Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Auer v. Cortado Group, LLC?

Auer v. Cortado Group, LLC is a federal contract lawsuit filed on 06/17/2025 in the District Court, D. Nevada. The case is currently open in the federal court system. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Contract” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, D. Nevada, docket number 2:25-cv-01077.

When was the case filed?

Auer v. Cortado Group, LLC was filed on 06/17/2025. The case is currently open.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 28 U.S.C. § 1332 — Diversity jurisdiction.