Automated Packaging Systems v. Baker Etal
Automated Packaging Systems v. Baker Etal is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 05/27/1988 in the District Court, N.D. Ohio. The case was terminated on 02/13/1989.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Ohio (N.D. Ohio)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 05/27/1988
- Date terminated
- 02/13/1989
1,275 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Automated Packaging Systems
- defendant · Baker · 6295 cases
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Automated Packaging Systems v. Baker Etal?
Automated Packaging Systems v. Baker Etal is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 05/27/1988 in the District Court, N.D. Ohio. The case was terminated on 02/13/1989. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Ohio.
When was the case filed?
Automated Packaging Systems v. Baker Etal was filed on 05/27/1988. It was terminated on 02/13/1989.
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8837751 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).