Babst v. Archery Trade Association, Inc. <font color=\red\">DO Not Docket. Case Has Been Transferred OUT.</font>"
Babst v. Archery Trade Association, Inc. <font color=\red\">DO Not Docket. Case Has Been Transferred OUT.</font>" is a federal antitrust lawsuit filed on 06/27/2025 in the District Court, D. Minnesota. The case is currently open in the federal court system.
- Court
- District Court, D. Minnesota (D. Minnesota)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Laura M. Provinzino · 99 cases in index
- Docket number
- 0:25-cv-02721
- Cause
- 15:1 Antitrust Litigation
15 U.S.C. § 1 — Sherman Antitrust Act - Nature of suit
- 410 Anti-Trust
Claims of unlawful restraint of trade, monopolization, or anticompetitive conduct under the Sherman and Clayton Acts. - Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
- Jury demand
- Plaintiff
- Date filed
- 06/27/2025
576 Antitrust cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Babst · 4 cases
- defendant · Archery Trade Association, Inc. <font color=\red\">DO Not Docket. Case Has Been Transferred OUT.</font>" · 2 cases
Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern
This is one of 3 Antitrust cases in our index naming Archery Trade Association, Inc. <font color=\red\">DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.</font>" — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.
About Antitrust Lawsuits
Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Babst v. Archery Trade Association, Inc. <font color=\red\">DO Not Docket. Case Has Been Transferred OUT.</font>"?
Babst v. Archery Trade Association, Inc. <font color=\red\">DO Not Docket. Case Has Been Transferred OUT.</font>" is a federal antitrust lawsuit filed on 06/27/2025 in the District Court, D. Minnesota. The case is currently open in the federal court system. Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Antitrust” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Minnesota, docket number 0:25-cv-02721.
When was the case filed?
Babst v. Archery Trade Association, Inc. <font color=\red\">DO Not Docket. Case Has Been Transferred OUT.</font>" was filed on 06/27/2025. The case is currently open.
What law is the case brought under?
The docket lists the cause as 15 U.S.C. § 1 — Sherman Antitrust Act.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Antitrust Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record (docket 70656228).