Docket Nexus — Federal court records.
Labor Lawsuit

Badu v. McDade

Labor Terminated 05/11/2001 District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Badu v. McDade is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 02/26/2001 in the District Court, E.D. North Carolina. The case was terminated on 05/11/2001.

Court
District Court, E.D. North Carolina (E.D.N.C.)
Official Court Website →
Assigned judge
Malcolm J. Howard · 2,580 cases in index
Docket number
5:01-hc-00177
Nature of suit
790 Other labor litigation
Labor disputes not covered by a more specific category.
Jurisdiction
Federal question
Date filed
02/26/2001
Date terminated
05/11/2001

1,444 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

  • plaintiff · Badu · 4 cases
  • defendant · McDade · 103 cases

About Labor Lawsuits

Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Badu v. McDade?

Badu v. McDade is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 02/26/2001 in the District Court, E.D. North Carolina. The case was terminated on 05/11/2001. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, E.D. North Carolina, docket number 5:01-hc-00177.

When was the case filed?

Badu v. McDade was filed on 02/26/2001. It was terminated on 05/11/2001.

Other Cases Involving These Parties

Related Labor Cases

Source: public U.S. federal court record (docket 17783958).