Baggett v. Chater
Baggett v. Chater is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 07/31/1995 in the District Court, N.D. Georgia. The case was terminated on 09/30/1996.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Georgia (N.D. Ga.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Harold L. Murphy · 3,547 cases in index
- Docket number
- 4:95-cv-00218
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 07/31/1995
- Date terminated
- 09/30/1996
1,540 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Baggett v. Chater?
Baggett v. Chater is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 07/31/1995 in the District Court, N.D. Georgia. The case was terminated on 09/30/1996. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Georgia, docket number 4:95-cv-00218.
When was the case filed?
Baggett v. Chater was filed on 07/31/1995. It was terminated on 09/30/1996.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10284596 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 4:95-cv-00218 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).