Bagley v. Marx
Bagley v. Marx is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 08/08/1989 in the District Court, D. Utah. The case was terminated on 05/30/1990.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Utah (D. Utah)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- David Sam · 2,064 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:89-cv-00710
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 08/08/1989
- Date terminated
- 05/30/1990
687 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Bagley v. Marx?
Bagley v. Marx is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 08/08/1989 in the District Court, D. Utah. The case was terminated on 05/30/1990. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Utah, docket number 2:89-cv-00710.
When was the case filed?
Bagley v. Marx was filed on 08/08/1989. It was terminated on 05/30/1990.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9093497 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:89-cv-00710 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).