Bahr v. Whitman
Bahr v. Whitman is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 05/14/2001 in the District Court, D. Arizona. The case was terminated on 10/04/2001.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Arizona (D. Ariz.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Roslyn O Silver · 3,026 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:01-cv-00835
- Nature of suit
- 893 Environmental matters
Claims under federal environmental statutes. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 05/14/2001
- Date terminated
- 10/04/2001
6,318 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Bahr v. Whitman?
Bahr v. Whitman is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 05/14/2001 in the District Court, D. Arizona. The case was terminated on 10/04/2001. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Arizona, docket number 2:01-cv-00835.
When was the case filed?
Bahr v. Whitman was filed on 05/14/2001. It was terminated on 10/04/2001.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 20345642 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:01-cv-00835 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).