Bailey v. Hahn
Bailey v. Hahn is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 06/10/2013 in the District Court, D. New Hampshire. The case was terminated on 11/18/2013.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. New Hampshire (D.N.H.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Joseph N. Laplante · 627 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:13-cv-00263
- Nature of suit
- 896 Arbitration
Actions to compel or confirm arbitration. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 06/10/2013
- Date terminated
- 11/18/2013
977 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Bailey v. Hahn?
Bailey v. Hahn is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 06/10/2013 in the District Court, D. New Hampshire. The case was terminated on 11/18/2013. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. New Hampshire, docket number 1:13-cv-00263.
When was the case filed?
Bailey v. Hahn was filed on 06/10/2013. It was terminated on 11/18/2013.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 13044803 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:13-cv-00263 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).