Baldwin Construction v. Steinbrecher

Court

District Court, D. Colorado (D. Colo.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Zita L. Weinshienk · 2,954 cases in index

Docket number

1:93-cv-02168

Cause

28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract
28 U.S.C. § 1332 — Diversity jurisdiction

Nature of suit

190 Other contract actions
General breach-of-contract disputes not covered by a more specific category.

Jurisdiction

Diversity

Jury demand

None

Date filed

10/14/1993

Date terminated

11/30/1993

13,858 Contract cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Baldwin Construction
• defendant · Steinbrecher · 11 cases

About Contract Lawsuits

Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Baldwin Construction v. Steinbrecher?

Baldwin Construction v. Steinbrecher is a federal contract lawsuit filed on 10/14/1993 in the District Court, D. Colorado. The case was terminated on 11/30/1993. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Contract” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, D. Colorado, docket number 1:93-cv-02168.

When was the case filed?

Baldwin Construction v. Steinbrecher was filed on 10/14/1993. It was terminated on 11/30/1993.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 28 U.S.C. § 1332 — Diversity jurisdiction.