Balser v. Hohman
Balser v. Hohman is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 08/10/1989 in the District Court, D. Idaho. The case was terminated on 04/02/1991.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Idaho (D. Idaho)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Stephen M. Ayers · 2 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:89-cv-03049
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 08/10/1989
- Date terminated
- 04/02/1991
313 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Balser v. Hohman?
Balser v. Hohman is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 08/10/1989 in the District Court, D. Idaho. The case was terminated on 04/02/1991. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Idaho, docket number 3:89-cv-03049.
When was the case filed?
Balser v. Hohman was filed on 08/10/1989. It was terminated on 04/02/1991.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9249429 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:89-cv-03049 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).