Bass v. Schwartz
Bass v. Schwartz is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 12/19/1991 in the District Court, D. Oregon. The case was terminated on 05/29/1992.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Oregon (D. Or.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- William M. Dale · 557 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:91-cv-01318
- Nature of suit
- 830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 12/19/1991
- Date terminated
- 05/29/1992
625 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.
About Patent Lawsuits
Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Bass v. Schwartz?
Bass v. Schwartz is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 12/19/1991 in the District Court, D. Oregon. The case was terminated on 05/29/1992. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Oregon, docket number 3:91-cv-01318.
When was the case filed?
Bass v. Schwartz was filed on 12/19/1991. It was terminated on 05/29/1992.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Patent Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9485334 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:91-cv-01318 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).