Bataan Licensing LLC v. Knightscope, Inc

Court

District Court, D. Delaware (D. Del.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Vacant Judgeship (2022) · 90 cases in index

Docket number

1:22-cv-00241

Cause

35:271 Patent Infringement
35 U.S.C. § 271 — Patent infringement

Nature of suit

830 Patent
Infringement of a patented invention.

Jurisdiction

Federal Question

Jury demand

Plaintiff

Date filed

02/25/2022

Date terminated

07/25/2022

11,769 Patent cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Bataan Licensing LLC · 20 cases
• defendant · Knightscope, Inc Telecommunications Equipment · 2 cases

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 3 Patent cases in our index naming Knightscope, Inc — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

About Patent Lawsuits

Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Bataan Licensing LLC v. Knightscope, Inc?

Bataan Licensing LLC v. Knightscope, Inc is a federal patent lawsuit filed on 02/25/2022 in the District Court, D. Delaware. The case was terminated on 07/25/2022. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Patent” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Patent lawsuits allege infringement of a patented invention — that another party made, used, or sold a protected technology without authorization. These cases are common in technology and pharmaceutical industries.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, D. Delaware, docket number 1:22-cv-00241.

When was the case filed?

Bataan Licensing LLC v. Knightscope, Inc was filed on 02/25/2022. It was terminated on 07/25/2022.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 35 U.S.C. § 271 — Patent infringement.