Bates v. Runda
Bates v. Runda is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 01/31/1992 in the District Court, W.D. Kentucky. The case was terminated on 01/31/1992.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, W.D. Kentucky (W.D. Ky.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Charles M. Allen · 283 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:92-cv-00071
- Nature of suit
- 893 Environmental matters
Claims under federal environmental statutes. - Jurisdiction
- Government plaintiff
- Date filed
- 01/31/1992
- Date terminated
- 01/31/1992
1,592 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Bates v. Runda?
Bates v. Runda is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 01/31/1992 in the District Court, W.D. Kentucky. The case was terminated on 01/31/1992. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, W.D. Kentucky, docket number 3:92-cv-00071.
When was the case filed?
Bates v. Runda was filed on 01/31/1992. It was terminated on 01/31/1992.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 18232971 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:92-cv-00071 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).