Baugh v. Prudential Health
Baugh v. Prudential Health is a federal contract lawsuit filed on 09/21/2001 in the District Court, D. Colorado. The case was terminated on 12/03/2001.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Colorado (D. Colo.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Zita L. Weinshienk · 2,954 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:01-cv-01875
- Cause
- 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
29 U.S.C. § 1132 — ERISA (employee benefits) - Nature of suit
- 110 Insurance
Disputes over an insurance policy — denial of a claim, the scope of coverage, or an insurer's alleged bad-faith handling. - Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
- Jury demand
- None
- Date filed
- 09/21/2001
- Date terminated
- 12/03/2001
14,046 Contract cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Baugh · 181 cases
- defendant · Prudential Health · 113 cases
Other Cases Naming This Defendant
Prudential Health is named in 113 federal civil cases in this index. Recent Contract cases naming the same defendant:
About Contract Lawsuits
Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Baugh v. Prudential Health?
Baugh v. Prudential Health is a federal contract lawsuit filed on 09/21/2001 in the District Court, D. Colorado. The case was terminated on 12/03/2001. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Contract” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Contract lawsuits involve disputes over an agreement between parties — claims that one side failed to perform, breached a term, or owes money under a contract. Common examples include unpaid invoices, broken business deals, and warranty or insurance disputes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Colorado, docket number 1:01-cv-01875.
When was the case filed?
Baugh v. Prudential Health was filed on 09/21/2001. It was terminated on 12/03/2001.
What law is the case brought under?
The docket lists the cause as 29 U.S.C. § 1132 — ERISA (employee benefits).
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Contract Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 11488292 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:01-cv-01875 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).