Baughn v. Moulton
Baughn v. Moulton is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 10/15/2013 in the District Court, D. Hawaii. The case was terminated on 09/03/2014.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Hawaii (D. Haw.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Leslie E. Kobayashi · 576 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:13-cv-00532
- Nature of suit
- 370 Other fraud
Fraud or misrepresentation claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 10/15/2013
- Date terminated
- 09/03/2014
838 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Baughn v. Moulton?
Baughn v. Moulton is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 10/15/2013 in the District Court, D. Hawaii. The case was terminated on 09/03/2014. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Hawaii, docket number 1:13-cv-00532.
When was the case filed?
Baughn v. Moulton was filed on 10/15/2013. It was terminated on 09/03/2014.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 32671332 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:13-cv-00532 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).