Bcbu v. Shalala
Bcbu v. Shalala is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 02/03/2000 in the District Court, D. Utah. The case was terminated on 01/12/2005.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Utah (D. Utah)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Dee Benson · 3,547 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:00-cv-00011
- Nature of suit
- 890 Other statutory actions
Federal statutory claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 02/03/2000
- Date terminated
- 01/12/2005
2,827 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Bcbu v. Shalala?
Bcbu v. Shalala is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 02/03/2000 in the District Court, D. Utah. The case was terminated on 01/12/2005. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Utah, docket number 1:00-cv-00011.
When was the case filed?
Bcbu v. Shalala was filed on 02/03/2000. It was terminated on 01/12/2005.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 17890777 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:00-cv-00011 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).