Bcc Inc v. Vanpelt
Bcc Inc v. Vanpelt is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 10/20/1998 in the District Court, E.D. Michigan. The case was terminated on 07/27/1999.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, E.D. Michigan (E.D. Mich.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Gerald E. Rosen · 3,437 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:98-cv-74549
- Nature of suit
- 820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 10/20/1998
- Date terminated
- 07/27/1999
1,946 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.
About Copyright Lawsuits
Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Bcc Inc v. Vanpelt?
Bcc Inc v. Vanpelt is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 10/20/1998 in the District Court, E.D. Michigan. The case was terminated on 07/27/1999. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, E.D. Michigan, docket number 2:98-cv-74549.
When was the case filed?
Bcc Inc v. Vanpelt was filed on 10/20/1998. It was terminated on 07/27/1999.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Copyright Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10792222 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:98-cv-74549 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).