Beam v. Astrue
Beam v. Astrue is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 08/15/2007 in the District Court, D. Montana. The case was terminated on 02/23/2009.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Montana (D. Mont.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Donald W. Molloy · 1,694 cases in index
- Docket number
- 9:07-cv-00102
- Nature of suit
- 893 Environmental matters
Claims under federal environmental statutes. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 08/15/2007
- Date terminated
- 02/23/2009
1,252 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Beam v. Astrue?
Beam v. Astrue is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 08/15/2007 in the District Court, D. Montana. The case was terminated on 02/23/2009. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Montana, docket number 9:07-cv-00102.
When was the case filed?
Beam v. Astrue was filed on 08/15/2007. It was terminated on 02/23/2009.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 14190780 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 9:07-cv-00102 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).