Beard v. Experian
Beard v. Experian is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 01/26/2006 in the District Court, N.D. Texas. The case was terminated on 02/07/2006.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Texas (N.D. Tex.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Terry R Means · 5,508 cases in index
- Docket number
- 4:06-cv-00078
- Nature of suit
- 820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 01/26/2006
- Date terminated
- 02/07/2006
1,967 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.
About Copyright Lawsuits
Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Beard v. Experian?
Beard v. Experian is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 01/26/2006 in the District Court, N.D. Texas. The case was terminated on 02/07/2006. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Texas, docket number 4:06-cv-00078.
When was the case filed?
Beard v. Experian was filed on 01/26/2006. It was terminated on 02/07/2006.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Copyright Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 14144487 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 4:06-cv-00078 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).