Beauregard v. Peltier
Beauregard v. Peltier is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 01/17/2008 in the District Court, D. Rhode Island. The case was terminated on 04/29/2008.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Rhode Island (D.R.I.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 371 Truth in lending
Claims under the Truth in Lending Act over consumer-credit disclosures. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 01/17/2008
- Date terminated
- 04/29/2008
393 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Beauregard · 57 cases
- defendant · Peltier · 80 cases
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Beauregard v. Peltier?
Beauregard v. Peltier is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 01/17/2008 in the District Court, D. Rhode Island. The case was terminated on 04/29/2008. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Rhode Island.
When was the case filed?
Beauregard v. Peltier was filed on 01/17/2008. It was terminated on 04/29/2008.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 62812031 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).