Bell v. Guy
Bell v. Guy is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 12/23/1999 in the District Court, D. Connecticut. The case was terminated on 10/25/2000.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Connecticut (D. Conn.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Peter C. Dorsey · 3,074 cases in index
- Docket number
- 3:99-cv-02526
- Nature of suit
- 371 Truth in lending
Claims under the Truth in Lending Act over consumer-credit disclosures. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 12/23/1999
- Date terminated
- 10/25/2000
2,571 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Bell v. Guy?
Bell v. Guy is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 12/23/1999 in the District Court, D. Connecticut. The case was terminated on 10/25/2000. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Connecticut, docket number 3:99-cv-02526.
When was the case filed?
Bell v. Guy was filed on 12/23/1999. It was terminated on 10/25/2000.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 11135094 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 3:99-cv-02526 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).