Benn v. Rutty
Benn v. Rutty is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 09/25/1991 in the District Court, D. Connecticut. The case was terminated on 01/16/1992.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Connecticut (D. Conn.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Peter C. Dorsey · 3,074 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:91-cv-00870
- Nature of suit
- 380 Other personal property damage
Damage to or loss of personal property. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 09/25/1991
- Date terminated
- 01/16/1992
2,571 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Benn v. Rutty?
Benn v. Rutty is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 09/25/1991 in the District Court, D. Connecticut. The case was terminated on 01/16/1992. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Connecticut, docket number 2:91-cv-00870.
When was the case filed?
Benn v. Rutty was filed on 09/25/1991. It was terminated on 01/16/1992.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 9297343 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:91-cv-00870 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).