Berube v. Ladd
Berube v. Ladd is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 08/19/1997 in the District Court, D. Massachusetts. The case was terminated on 02/05/1998.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Massachusetts (D. Mass.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Patti B. Saris · 4,290 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:97-cv-11888
- Nature of suit
- 870 Tax suits
Federal tax disputes with the United States as a party. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 08/19/1997
- Date terminated
- 02/05/1998
8,000 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Berube v. Ladd?
Berube v. Ladd is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 08/19/1997 in the District Court, D. Massachusetts. The case was terminated on 02/05/1998. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Massachusetts, docket number 1:97-cv-11888.
When was the case filed?
Berube v. Ladd was filed on 08/19/1997. It was terminated on 02/05/1998.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10497636 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:97-cv-11888 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).