Best v. Stuchell Products, LLC

Court

District Court, N.D. Ohio (N.D. Ohio)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Sara Lioi · 1,594 cases in index

Docket number

5:14-cv-01625

Cause

15:2(a) Fair Labor Standards Act
15 U.S.C. § 2 — Sherman Act (monopolization)

Nature of suit

710 Labor: Fair Standards
Unpaid-wage and overtime claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Jurisdiction

Federal Question

Jury demand

Plaintiff

Date filed

07/23/2014

Date terminated

06/09/2015

12,801 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Best · 559 cases
• defendant · Stuchell Products, LLC

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 2 Labor cases in our index naming Stuchell Products, LLC — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

About Labor Lawsuits

Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Best v. Stuchell Products, LLC?

Best v. Stuchell Products, LLC is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 07/23/2014 in the District Court, N.D. Ohio. The case was terminated on 06/09/2015. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, N.D. Ohio, docket number 5:14-cv-01625.

When was the case filed?

Best v. Stuchell Products, LLC was filed on 07/23/2014. It was terminated on 06/09/2015.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 15 U.S.C. § 2 — Sherman Act (monopolization).