Bigler v. Oksendahl
Bigler v. Oksendahl is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 09/25/2003 in the District Court, D. Alaska. The case was terminated on 07/15/2004.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Alaska (D. Alaska)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- John W. Sedwick · 1,598 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:03-cv-00022
- Nature of suit
- 380 Other personal property damage
Damage to or loss of personal property. - Jurisdiction
- Diversity of citizenship
- Date filed
- 09/25/2003
- Date terminated
- 07/15/2004
290 Personal Property / Fraud cases in this court are indexed here.
About Personal Property / Fraud Lawsuits
These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Bigler v. Oksendahl?
Bigler v. Oksendahl is a federal personal property / fraud lawsuit filed on 09/25/2003 in the District Court, D. Alaska. The case was terminated on 07/15/2004. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Personal Property / Fraud” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These cases involve damage to or loss of personal property, or claims of fraud and misrepresentation — including truth-in-lending and other deception-based claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Alaska, docket number 1:03-cv-00022.
When was the case filed?
Bigler v. Oksendahl was filed on 09/25/2003. It was terminated on 07/15/2004.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Personal Property / Fraud Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 14078119 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:03-cv-00022 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).