Bittinger v. Bowie
Bittinger v. Bowie is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 12/18/2001 in the District Court, N.D. Georgia. The case was terminated on 03/04/2002.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Georgia (N.D. Ga.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Robert L. Vining, Jr · 4,303 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:01-cv-03452
- Nature of suit
- 820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 12/18/2001
- Date terminated
- 03/04/2002
1,643 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.
About Copyright Lawsuits
Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Bittinger v. Bowie?
Bittinger v. Bowie is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 12/18/2001 in the District Court, N.D. Georgia. The case was terminated on 03/04/2002. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Georgia, docket number 1:01-cv-03452.
When was the case filed?
Bittinger v. Bowie was filed on 12/18/2001. It was terminated on 03/04/2002.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Copyright Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 11514227 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:01-cv-03452 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).