Bjork v. Higgins
Bjork v. Higgins is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 12/18/1998 in the District Court, D. Utah. The case was terminated on 10/01/1999.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Utah (D. Utah)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Tena Campbell · 2,840 cases in index
- Docket number
- 2:98-cv-00901
- Nature of suit
- 890 Other statutory actions
Federal statutory claims not covered by a more specific category. - Jurisdiction
- Government defendant
- Date filed
- 12/18/1998
- Date terminated
- 10/01/1999
2,827 Federal Tax / Statutory Actions cases in this court are indexed here.
About Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Lawsuits
This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Bjork v. Higgins?
Bjork v. Higgins is a federal tax / statutory actions lawsuit filed on 12/18/1998 in the District Court, D. Utah. The case was terminated on 10/01/1999. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Federal Tax / Statutory Actions” under the federal nature-of-suit system. This group covers federal tax disputes and other statutory actions, including IRS-related suits and claims arising under various federal regulatory statutes.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Utah, docket number 2:98-cv-00901.
When was the case filed?
Bjork v. Higgins was filed on 12/18/1998. It was terminated on 10/01/1999.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Federal Tax / Statutory Actions Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 11102147 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 2:98-cv-00901 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).